月旦知識庫
月旦知識庫 會員登入元照網路書店月旦品評家
 
 
  1. 熱門:
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中外法学 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
論數字時代多邊平臺的相關市場界定
作者 王曉曄
中文摘要
相關市場界定是競爭分析的核心環節之一,也是反壟斷法中技術性最強的領域。在數字時代,由於多邊平臺存在巨大的間接網絡效應,平臺一邊往往提供“零價格”服務,多邊平臺的相關市場界定要比傳統經濟下單邊市場的相關市場界定複雜得多。考慮到多邊平臺的一邊往往以“零價格”提供服務,界定市場需要重視非價格參數,SSNIP測試在實踐中就需要變通為SSNDQ。數字時代的多邊平臺可簡單區分為交易性與非交易性,交易性平臺如電子商務平臺的兩邊可以包括在一個產品市場之內。但是美國Amex案說明,將交易性平臺機械地視為單一市場不能充分體現平臺兩邊用戶群各自不同的需求替代,不能適應現實中複雜的市場環境。數字生態系統的相關市場現在也成為人們關注的問題。鑒於數字生態系統主要考慮系統內部各企業之間以及各種產品和服務之間的互補性,這本質上削弱了界定相關市場的必要性和實用性,國際上迄今尚未出現界定數字生態系統相關市場的案件。
英文摘要
How to define relevant markets is one of the core links in competitive analysis, and also the field with the strongest technicality in anti-monopoly law. In the digital age, due to the huge indirect network effect of multilateral platforms, one side of the platforms often provides“zero-price”services. Thus, market definition of the multilateral platforms is much more complex than that of unilateral markets in the traditional economy. Considering that one side of multilateral platforms often provides services at“zero price,”non-price parameters need to be emphasized when defining the relevant market. In practice, SSNIP testing therefore needs to be adapted to SSNDQ. In the digital age, multilateral platforms may be simply classified into transactional and non-transactional ones. Even though the both sides of some transactional platforms, such as e-commerce platforms, can be included within the same product market. However, the Amex case in the US shows that mechanically placing both sides of a transactional platform within the same relevant market cannot fully reflect the different demand substitution of the user groups on both sides of the platform, and cannot adapt to the complex market environment in reality. How to define the relevant market of the digital ecosystems has also become a concern of the competition law community. Given that the digital ecosystem mainly considers the mutual complementation among enterprises and among various products and services within an ecosystem, this essentially weakens the necessity and practicality of defining the relevant market. There has been no case of defining the relevant market of the digital ecosystem so far globally.
起訖頁 886-904
關鍵詞 數字時代多邊平臺市場界定零價格服務數字生態系統Digital AgeMultilateral PlatformsMarket DefinitionServices at“Zero Price”Digital Ecosystem
刊名 中外法学  
期數 202507 (220期)
出版單位 北京大學法學院
該期刊-上一篇 國家的法觀念嬗變及其法治意義
該期刊-下一篇 論數據財產權與在先權利的關係
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄