| 英文摘要 |
Objective: To analyze whether the amendments to the Medical Care Act in 2014 and 2017 achieved their legislative goals of preventing case cover-ups, increasing penalties, and reducing incidents of medical violence. Methods: Using the Judicial Yuan’s legal research system, we searched for final court rulings on violations of Article 106, Paragraph 3 of the Medical Care Act from 2014 to 2019. We also examined relevant court judgments and analyzed statistical data from the ''Medical Institution Violence Reporting Mechanism'' published in the Executive Yuan Gazette from 2018 to 2022. Results: The study found that after the 2014 amendment, the number of judicial cases significantly increased to 200–300. The average sentencing duration for three periods was as follows: pre-2014 (77.9 days), 2014–2017 (61.03 days), and post-2017 (72.58 days). Reports of medical violence showed a downward trend, decreasing from 399 cases in 2018 to 260 cases in 2022. The average annual case closure rate was 61%, with significant regional disparities (ranging from 27% to 100%). Only 22% of reported cases resulted in administrative or criminal penalties. Conclusion: While the amendments improved case visibility, the number of reported incidents remained high, and sentencing remained relatively lenient, raising concerns about the deterrent effect. Additionally, there were significant discrepancies in the efficiency of local health authorities in handling cases. It is recommended that central authorities establish standardized guidance mechanisms to enhance law enforcement effectiveness. |