| 英文摘要 |
This study focuses on publicly listed companies in Taiwan and explores the sustainability performance of family firms. The empirical results show that family firms have lower sustainability performance compared to non-family firms. This finding is consistent with the conflict-of-interest hypothesis and suggests that family firms aim to maximize family benefits. These benefits are often closely tied to business activities. However, engaging in sustainability activities is a long-term transformational process, which will increase the uncertainty of business profits. Therefore, family firms are less likely to engage in sustainability activities and have poorer sustainability performance. However, the empirical results indicate that if a family member serves as the chief executive officer(CEO), the negative relationship between family firms and sustainability performance can be mitigated. This finding is aligned with the convergence-of-interest hypothesis and the socioemotional wealth theory, indicating that family firms with family CEOs place greater importance on family reputation and social status. Thereby, they are dedicated to enhancing the company's sustainability performance. Finally, the empirical results show that CEO overconfidence have no effect on the relationship between family firms and sustainability performance. |