| 英文摘要 |
In recent years, political candidates have increasingly incorporated pet imagery into their campaign advertisements, but little research has explored the effects. This study integrates the meaning transfer model, social judgments, gender stereotypes, and conceptual metaphor theory to investigate the effects of incorporating pet visuals in local-level election campaign advertisements. The results of two experiments reveal the following: (1) adding pet imagery to campaign advertisements increases voters’perceived candidate warmth but diminishes perceived competence; (2) the positive impact of pet imagery on perceived warmth is amplified for male candidates, while the negative impact on perceived competence is weakened for female candidates; (3) only female candidates benefit from using pet imagery to improve voters’attitudes toward the candidate and voting intentions; (4) using a pet image that is larger (vs. smaller) than the candidate’s image weakens the positive impact of pet imagery on perceived candidate warmth; (5) when the pet imagery is smaller than the candidate, including pets (compared to no pets) improves candidate attitudes and voting intentions. This study clarifies the mechanisms of pet cues in campaign advertisements, offering innovative insights. The findings guide advertisers and candidates of different genders on the effective use of pet cues and inspire commercial marketing. |