| 英文摘要 |
According to the United Nations Report, the creative economy industries generate annual revenues of over $2 trillion and provide nearly 50 million jobs worldwide. Despite the massive growth, the creative economy still has much room to grow, but there are also several challenges, including the financing scheme. The creative economy is linked strongly with intellectual property as one of the most important creative business assets. The importance of financing the creative economy sector has been acknowledged and implemented in many countries through the Intellectual Property Financing Scheme (IPFS) although in implementation, this IPFS faces several challenges that impact the success rate. This paper aims to analyze the regulation and implementation of the IPFS in Indonesia and Singapore using the juridical normative approach and the implementing models. This research found that the Government of Indonesia dominantly used regulative and policy approaches while the Government of Singapore took the programs and initiative-based approach by launching a range of programs and initiatives. Based on an analysis of challenges faced by Indonesia and Singapore in the implementation of IPFS, the authors conclude that government intervention potentially becomes a critical factor in mitigating the challenges. Lastly, the model of government initiative and intervention need to be comprehensive and practical. |