| 英文摘要 |
The opposition between abstraction and realism is a major subject in art. The sculpture of Ju Ming was dominated by the realism ni the very beginning (including the“Native series”and even earlier works), and started to try the abstraction under the inspiration of modern art. The evolution from the two earliest versions of Taichi-Single Whip Series carved in 1976, to the“Museum”version cast in 1986 and exhibited nowadays in the Ju Ming Museum, as well as theL iving World Series, are all results of the process of abstraction. Without takingn ito account works other than the Taichi-Single Whip Series, this process did not evolve to practice total abstraction in the end. The“museum version”contains therefore at the same time elements of realism and abtrsaction in it, without stopping being a masterpiece. It incites us then to inquire into the distincton between abstraction and realism. Without taking into consideration more abstract works such as theT aichi Arc, this paper wil lattempt to clarify the roles abstraction and realism, if they may seem to be two absolutely distinct ways of creation, can play separately or in cooperation in the artistic creation. After elucidating briefly the sense of“realism”and“abstraction”, we will retrace comments made by critics on Taichi-Single Whip Series, in order to understand the evolution of its two critical stages and impressions products of each stage might bring to spectators. In consideration of the obscurity of the meaning of the“Taichi spirit”, the analysis will have as point of view a general cooperate in the creation of artistic experience of gravity insc ulpture. The paper will then proceed to investigate if an abstraction of higher degree would hinder the Single Whip from expressing a sentiment of naturalness instead of artificiality. |