| 英文摘要 |
The classification of museum collections in Taiwan is based on the Museum Act and its related enforcement regulations, such as the Regulations for the Inventory of Collections in Public Museums, as well as the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act. Under these regulations, museum collections are categorized into three levels according to the classification standards for cultural heritage and antiquities. However, this approach results in most collections being classified outside the category of antiquities, thereby undermining the original intent of classification—to allocate resources efficiently and optimize the use of collections. Additionally, this system excludes museums that do not collect antiquities, such as science and natural history museums, from the scope of the Regulations for the Inventory of Collections in Public Museums. Internationally, museum collection classification is designed to reduce costs, ensure sustainability, manage and guide collection development, and differentiate research activities or other practical uses. Each museum establishes its classification criteria based on its specific needs. Furthermore, the lowest tier of classification often includes a“pending deaccession”category, which not only helps manage storage space but also ensures that collections align more closely with the museum’s mission, making them more representative and purpose-driven. This aspect has not yet been fully discussed in Taiwan’s collection classification system. This paper aims to explore the standards and possibilities of establishing a classification system for museum collections by examining legal perspectives and classification methods used by both domestic and international museums. The ultimate goal is to develop a classification system that enables museums to make the most effective use of their limited storage resources and maximize the utility of their collections. |