| 英文摘要 |
This paper, based on the experiences of presidential direct elections in democratic countries worldwide, explores whether Taiwan’s presidential electoral system should transition from the current plurality system to a two-round majority system. This paper finds that the two-round majority system is the prevalent presidential electoral system adopted by democratic countries worldwide. Compared to the plurality system, this electoral system provides more space for small parties to survive, allowing the voices of minority groups in society to be heard by the mainstream. Additionally, it is observed that in presidential and semi-presidential democratic countries worldwide where the president is directly elected by the people, it is common practice to adopt a two-round majority system, irrespective of the extent of presidential constitutional powers. This suggests that there is no apparent correlation between the magnitude of presidential constitutional powers and the type of presidential electoral system. Moreover, based on the operational experiences of democratic countries worldwide, it is found that the president elected under the plurality system does not necessarily have less popular support than the president elected under the two-round majority system. However, in a country with significant social cleavages, the plurality system may elect a president with less than half of the nationwide vote. In conclusion, considering the advantages demonstrated by the implementation of the two-round majority system in democratic countries globally, adopting the two-round majority system for Taiwan’s presidential election would be beneficial. However, since Taiwan’s constitution explicitly stipulates the presidential electoral system as a plurality system, Taiwan’s presidential electoral system requires constitutional revision rather than legislative amendment. |