| 英文摘要 |
The right of withdrawal in the special transactions has been introduced into the Consumer Protection Act in order to protect the sound independent decision of consumers. However, because this right is a nightmare of the sanctity of contracts, it should be interpreted narrowly based on the principle of strict explanation for exceptions. It also should be closely linked to the individual transaction. The particularity of the transaction objects may be ignored without any exceptions, and this has led to a continual need for exceptions in practices to balance the legitimate interests of traders and consumers. Consequently, when the Consumer Protection Act was amended in 2015, it introduced the reasonable matters for the distances sales by the reference to the foreign legislature. In comparison with legislative examples from Germany and the European Union, those exceptions remain relatively narrow, and should need to be amended. The reasonable matters are mainly based on the nature of goods or services, which are physically or economically unable to return. These considerations balance the costs of traders and the concerns of potential abuse of consumer rights. Since it adopts an enumerative rather than illustrative approach, any expansion would require modifying the content of the regulation. Given that the current regulations are orders and not acts, expanding them should not pose overly high difficulties. Furthermore, the application of existing exceptions still has certain ambiguities, which are also reviewed and recommendations for future legislative amendments are also discussed in this article. |