「轉注」旁證

The Scholium of“Zhuan Zhu”

「轉注」之說，枝蕪紛雜。仍有學者撰文對其進行繼續探討，截至目前為此，學界對轉注尚未有公認之定論。本文「藉外論之」，滲入「數學」概念與「理則學」視點作為旁證，足以析出下列三項： 一、「文字學轉注」：重在探討「造字」初始之基本義，進以了解與「基本義」相關之轉注。 二、「訓詁學轉注」：重在探討「用字」取擇之合理義，進以了解與「合理義」相關之轉注。 三、「複詞式轉注」：即探討「複詞」產生「因『用字』而同義」之學問，亦重在探討「用字」取擇之合理義，進以了解與「合理義」相關之轉注。

There is a variety of perspective related to“Zhuan Zhu.”Scholars have still done research on it up to now. However, there is no generally-acknowledged conclusion. In my opinion, I take the viewpoint of mathematics and philosophy as three analysis of scholium of“Zhuan Zhu”as follows. I.“Chinese Paleographic Zhuan Zhu”focuses on original meaning of creation of Chinese characters. II.“Chinese Semantic ZHunan Zhu”focuses on the use of words. III.“Chinese Lexicological Zhuan Zhu”focuses on the synonymy of Chinese compound words.