月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
科技法學論叢 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
氣候變遷對憲法健康權「主、客觀效力」之影響
並列篇名
The Impact of Climate Change on the “Subjective and Objective Effectiveness” of the Right to Health in Constitution
作者 王服清 (Fu-Ching Wang)
中文摘要
氣候變遷之嚴重性對於基本權利之影響呈現在危害人性尊嚴、危害生命權以及危害身體與精神完整權。德國健康權的憲法依據主要在基本法第2條第1項暨第2項第1句。由於基本權利具有客觀效力及主觀效力,當然健康權亦復如此,因此進一步地產生氣候變遷意義下的健康權是否具主觀效力之爭論。另外,我國憲法健康權之詮釋主要係司法院(憲法法庭)之相關解釋、理由書及大法官們各自提出多元豐富的意見書。大多數的大法官、憲法學者皆肯認健康權屬於憲法第22條未列舉之權利。而且我國憲法健康權之效力有幾個特點:複合性權利、憲法不能作為主觀權利之依據、國家負有最低限度之保護義務、已非方針規定性質以及結合平等原則之拘束(例如長期照護醫藥費列舉扣除額之問題對納稅義務人造成差別待遇且對受扶養人造成生存權以及健康權受侵害)。本文歸納與分析德國與我國憲法層次的健康權之特色與異同,提供反思與借鏡。
英文摘要
The seriousness of climate change affects basic rights by jeopardizing human dignity, the right to life and the right to physical and mental integrity. The constitutional basis for the right to health in Germany is mainly found in Article 2, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, first sentence of the Basic Law. Since basic rights have both objective and subjective effectiveness, and of course the right to health is also the same, there is further debate on whether the right to health in the context of climate change has subjective effectiveness. In addition, the interpretation of the right to health in our country’s constitution is mainly based on the relevant interpretations and reasons of the Judicial Yuan (Constitutional Court) and the diverse and rich opinions issued by the many Judes. Most Judes and constitutional scholars agree with that the right to health is a right not enumerated in Article 22 of the Constitution. Moreover, the effectiveness of the right to health in our country’s constitution has several characteristics: it is a compound right, the constitution cannot be used as the basis for subjective rights, the state has the minimum obligation to protect it, it is no longer a policy directive, and it is combined with the constraints of the principle of equality (such as long-term care medical expenses, this issue of enumeration of deductions results in differential treatment of taxpayers and infringement of the rights to survival and health of dependents). This article summarizes and analyzes the characteristics, similarities and differences of the right to health between the constitutional levels in Germany and my country, and provides us of reflection and reference.
起訖頁 1-83
關鍵詞 氣候變遷健康權客觀效力主觀效力基本國策Climate ChangeRight to HealthObjective EffectivenessSubjective EffectivenessBasic National Policy
刊名 科技法學論叢  
期數 202312 (19期)
出版單位 國立雲林科技大學科技法律研究所
該期刊-下一篇 地方自治團體地方稅立法權之界限──花蓮縣礦石開採特別稅案相關判決之評釋
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄