四種《杜工部集》抄本考論

Examining the Four Handwritten Copies of Du Gong Bu Ji

清初所流傳南宋刻本《杜工部集》，乃由「二王本」、「吳若本」的翻刻本牉合而成。原書今已殘缺，尚存四種抄本。其中日本靜嘉堂文庫藏毛氏汲古閣抄本，為毛晉抄本，乃諸抄本之祖，文本最接近宋刻。毛扆稱其為「影寫」，但實際為照抄仿寫，而非覆紙影寫。上海圖書館藏毛扆抄配本，在宋刻「殘本三冊」的基礎上，據毛晉本補抄。在轉抄過程中，毛扆曾據《錢注杜詩》校改毛晉本文字，導致毛晉本乃至宋刻原貌的喪失，其抄本部分的文獻價值應予重新認識。中國國家圖書館藏錢曾述古堂抄本、臺灣「國家圖書館」藏抄本，均屬毛晉本傳抄系統。錢曾本較毛晉本所多出的卷19首二頁及〈東西兩川說〉後半部分，當是依據《錢注杜詩》加以增補。

In the early Qing dynasty, there was a Southern Song dynasty woodblock-printed edition of Du Gong Bu ji (杜工部集), which was composed of reprinted editions of Er Wang Ben (二王本) and Wu Ruo Ben (吳若本). Later, the book became incomplete. Four handwritten copies of the book have survived to this day. Among them, Mao Jin Ben (毛晉本) in Seikado Bunko of Japan (日本靜嘉堂文庫), which is the ancestor of the extant handwritten copies, is the closest to the Song dynasty edition. Mao Yi pointed out that Mao Jin Ben was an apograph. But the Mao Jin Ben is just an ordinary manuscript. Shanghai Library of Mao Yi Ben (毛扆本) was added based on remaining part of original books of the Song dynasty. The supplementary content is based on Mao Jin Ben. In the process of copying, Mao Yi collated Mao Jin Ben based on Qian Zhu Du Shi (錢注杜詩), which led to the loss of Mao Yi Ben and even the original appearance of the Song dynasty edition. The Qian Zeng Ben (錢曾本) of the National Library of China and the handwritten copies of the National Central Library were instead part of the Mao Jin transcription system. Compared with the Mao Jin Ben, the extra part of Qian Zeng Ben comes from“Qian Zhu Du Shi.”