能動司法背景下城區人民法庭參與訴源治理的邏輯與進路──以新時代人民法庭建設的“花鄉做法”為中心

The Logic and Approach of Managing the Source of Litigation in Urban People' s Court: Centered on the“Huaxiang Case”in the Construction of People' s Courts in the New Era

新時代人民法庭建設的“花鄉做法”表明，訴源治理是當前城區人民法庭參與基層社會治理的重要方式。訴源治理基本上覆蓋了糾紛發生前後全過程，糾紛發生前主要以風險預測為主，糾紛解決中則以工作指引、調解指導及裁判說理等方式為主，糾紛解決後則以司法建議為主。人民法庭的訴源治理策略貫徹著“政策—法律”“跨界—守界”雙重邏輯，前者是人民法庭的一般邏輯，而後者則是城區人民法庭的特有邏輯。雙重邏輯內部存在著結構性張力，城區人民法庭與其他治理主體的關係應從分工轉向合作，通過訴源治理增強分工合作的主動性與靈活性，與其他非司法性力量協同解決複雜的城市治理問題。

A case study based on the“Huaxiang experience”shows that governance of sources of litigation is the main strategy for urban people’s courts to participate in grassroots social governance. Governance of sources of litigation basically covers the whole process before and after a dispute occurs. Before a dispute occurs, risk prediction is the main focus; during dispute resolution, work guidelines, mediation guidance, and referee reasoning are the main methods; after dispute resolution, judicial advice is the main focus. The source of litigation management strategy in people’s court implements the dual logic of“policies-law”and“crossover-defense”. The former is the general logic of the people’s courts, while the latter is the unique logic of the urban people’s courts. There are structural tensions within the dual logic. The relationship between urban people’s courts and other governance subjects should shift from jurisdictional competition to jurisdictional cooperation, actively create“intentional blurring of boundaries”through litigation source governance, and cooperate with other non-judicial forces to jointly resolve complex issues.