月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
中華體育季刊 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
GRADE方法:體育與運動科學領域中系統性回顧之證據可信度和建議強度的評估工具
並列篇名
GRADE approach: An assessment tool for the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations in systematic reviews in the fields of physical education, sport, and exercise sciences
作者 李瑞鴻鄭伊婷陳映竹洪辰歆張育愷 (Yu-Kai Chang)
中文摘要
建議、測量、發展、評估之等級(Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations, GRADE)方法係用於評估系統性回顧與指引方針證據可信度(certainty of evidence)及建議強度(strength of recommendation)之工具。過去,系統性回顧在評估證據可信度時,常以偏誤風險(risk of bias)和發表偏誤(publication bias)作為依據,然仍有可能降低(downgrade)或提升(upgrade)證據可信度之因素,包括結果之間接性(indirectness)、不一致性(inconsistency)、不精確性(imprecision)等,或效果大小與混淆因素(confounding)排除等。值得注意的是,GRADE方法不僅能全面地考量多種可能提升或降低證據可信度之因素外,更可依據證據可信度與考量其他因素,進一步提出建議強度,提供臨床決策者參考。具體而言,GRADE方法大致可分成五個步驟,包括決定初始證據可信度、考量降級或升級因素、評估證據可信度、考量其它因素,以及提出建議強度。近年,國際已有許多體育與運動科學領域之研究者採用GRADE方法,評估系統性回顧之證據可信度與建議強度,然在國內體育與運動科學領域則仍未有研究採用GRADE方法於系統性回顧。鑑於GRADE方法之優勢和當前國際之趨勢,簡介GRADE方法有其必要性之存在。因此,本文旨在簡介GRADE方法,並以體育與運動科學領域之研究為例,簡要介紹GRADE方法之起源、內容、影響與評估方法,並提出其優勢與限制,期望提供國內體育與運動科學領域之研究者對GRADE方法之總覽,且更好地將其運用於系統性回顧中。
英文摘要
The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach is a tool used to assess the certainty of evidence and the strength of recommendations in systematic reviews and guidelines. In the past, systematic reviews often relied on the risk of bias and publication bias as key criteria for assessing the certainty of evidence. However, there are factors that may either upgrade or downgrade the certainty of evidence, including indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, as well as considerations such as the magnitude of effects and the exclusion of confounding factors. It is worth noting that the GRADE approach not only comprehensively considers various factors that may impact the certainty of evidence but also provides the strength of recommendation for clinical decision-makers based on the certainty of the evidence and other factors. This offers valuable guidance for clinical decision-makers to consider. Specifically, the GRADE approach can be broadly categorized into five steps, encompassing the determination of the initial certainty of evidence, consideration of downgrading or upgrading factors, assessment of the certainty of evidence, consideration of other factors, and the proposal of the strength of recommendation. In recent years, many researchers in the fields of physical education, sport, and exercise sciences have adopted the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence and the strength of recommendations in systematic reviews. However, there have been no systematic reviews from the fields of physical education, sport, and exercise sciences that have utilized the GRADE approach in Taiwan. Given the advantages of the GRADE approach and the current international trend, it is necessary to provide an overview of the GRADE approach. This article aims to introduce the GRADE approach and using examples from research in the fields, briefly explain its origins, content, influence, assessment methods, advantages, and limitations. We hope that the article provides researchers in the fields of physical education, sport, and exercise sciences with an overview of the GRADE approach and enables them to better apply it in systematic reviews.
起訖頁 35-51
關鍵詞 證據品質證據金字塔統合分析實證醫學quality of evidenceevidence pyramidmeta-analysisevidence-based medicine
刊名 中華體育季刊  
期數 202403 (38:1期)
出版單位 中華民國體育學會
該期刊-上一篇 以生態系統理論談臺灣體育班學生在體育班制度下的學科學習環境:範域文獻回顧
該期刊-下一篇 政策移轉下的大專院校運動組織變革:日本大學體育協會之研究
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄