同儕推進的國際人權調查功能：以聯合國人權事務高級專員辦事處2022年新疆人權報告為中心

International Human Rights Investigation Functioned by Peer StimulationStimulation：Centered on the 2022 Xinjiang Human Rights Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights

本文以聯合國人權事務高級專員辦事處（下稱「人權高專辦」）2022年公布的新疆人權報告為中心，針對新疆再教育營林立、迫害維吾爾人的大規模人權惡化情形，討論人權條約機構、特別程序、非政府組織、媒體記者和各國等行動者，如何藉行動影響報告作成及發布，進而影響國際人權規範發展。此外2022年10月，聯合國人權理事會針對新疆狀況，否決作成譴責中國的決議，而身為其秘書處的「人權高專辦」卻作成報告，是否會造成人權規範上的矛盾？本文將一併探究之。
本文先行介紹人權高專辦的組織架構，爾後介紹中國對疆政策，並一一介紹各方行動，以及2022年5月「人權高專辦」訪中情形。此後本文介紹2022年新疆人權報告、中國後續反應和人權理事會否決情形。最後分析並作結。

The dissertation centers on the 2022 Xinjiang Human Rights Report（hereinafter“2022 Report”) of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights（hereinafter“OHCHR”), discussing the gross human rights deterioration in Xinjiang, PRC, i.e., Re-education Camps. It discusses how the acts of human rights treaty institutions, Special Procedures, non-governmental organizations, journalists, and nation-states influence the completion and announcement of the 2022 Report, and furthermore influence the development of international human rights norms. It also discusses whether the veto of United Nations Human Rights Council（hereinafter“UNHRC”) on the condemnation of PRC for Xinjiang situation causes the paradox in international human rights norms, with the announcement of the 2022 Report by its Secretariat, OHCHR.
The dissertation firstly introduces the framework and organization of OHCHR, then the PRC policies relating Xinjiang. Then, it introduces the acts of several kinds of agents, and the visit of PRC by OHCHR on May 2022. And then, it further introduces the 2022 Report and the reaction of PRC, and the veto of UNHRC. Finally, it analyzes the abovementioned peer-stimulation process, and concludes.