英文摘要 |
Compared with the independent compliance of enterprises, the construction of compliance management system implemented by enterprises promoted by administrative authorities has unique institutional advantages. At present, there are mainly three ways for administrative authorities to promote enterprise compliance management: administrative compliance guidance, administrative compliance enforcement and administrative compliance incentives. Among them, ''compliance guidance'' is an activity for administrative authorities to provide administrative guidance for relevant enterprises to establish or improve compliance management system by issuing ''compliance guidelines'' or ''compliance measures''. This kind of compliance guidance is provided by the administrative organ to ensure that the enterprise achieves the goal of effectively preventing the occurrence of illegal and illicit behaviors, and guides the enterprise to establish a set of management system aimed at preventing, monitoring or responding to compliance risks. At present, the provision of guidance on compliance management by administrative authorities through the issuance of compliance guidelines and other means has been generally implemented, but there are still problems in terms of lack of relevance, lack of effective compliance standards and lack of institutional safeguards. Compulsory compliance is another way in which administrative authorities promote the establishment of compliance systems by enterprises. Through the implementation of a ''mandatory compliance system'', administrative authorities oblige enterprises that meet the legal requirements to establish a compliance management system, and pursue administrative liability for enterprises that refuse to fulfill their obligations. At present, this system has been initially applied in some specific areas, but there are still problems of fragmentation and decentralization, and no systematic compliance enforcement mechanism has been formed. Administrative authorities have introduced the way of ''compliance reward'' through the compliance incentive mechanism, that is, to reward leniency administrative treatment for the illegal enterprises that carry out effective compliance rectification, establish effective compliance programs and achieve the effect of effectively preventing similar violations, in order to stimulate the enterprise's motivation to engage in the construction of the compliance system, and attract more enterprises to establish compliance management systems. At present, although the administrative compliance incentive mechanism has been established in securities, anti-monopoly and other supervision fields, there are few applicable cases, and the institutional characteristics of ''exchanging compliance for leniency'' are not obvious. In terms of administrative compliance guidance, administrative authority should guide enterprises to establish a compliance system in accordance with the ''risk-oriented compliance model'' and, with the help of relevant industry associations , strengthen effective compliance guidance for enterprises engaged in specific industries, issue practical criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of compliance programs, and implement more scientific methods for evaluating the effectiveness of compliance. In terms of mandatory administrative compliance, it is necessary to consider gradually introducing a comprehensive mandatory compliance mechanism in enterprises that have reached a certain scale or have significant compliance risks, strengthening the accountability of enterprises that do not fulfill their compliance obligations, and establishing a qualification certification mechanism for qualified enterprises in compliance construction. In terms of administrative compliance incentives, it is necessary to establish a more systematic pre-compliance incentive mechanism, in-event compliance incentive mechanism and ex-post compliance incentive mechanism. |