英文摘要 |
In order to protect the indigenous people, the indigenous reserve land can only be owned by the indigenous people in accordance with the law. In practice, however, there are contracts between non-indigenous people and indigenous people concerning indigenous reserve land, which are of course invalid according to Article 71 of the Civil Law. Disputes over the validity of such contracts shall be determined in accordance with Article 246 of the Civil Code, which may be an opportunity for circumvention of the law. For different reasons, this article agrees with the conclusion of Judgment No 1636 of the Civil Court of the Supreme Court in 2019, which held that where a contract provides that the non-indigenous person will be registered in the name of the indigenous person, and the subject matter acquired in accordance with the contract will be registered as being owned by the indigenous person of the borrower, and superficial rights are given the non-indigenous person at the same time, the overall transaction would be a roundabout violation of Article 71 of the Civil Code. Accordingly, the buyer would have no right to possess the property, and must return the property to the seller. The buyer should also cancel the registration of the transfer of ownership, while the seller shall be responsible for any expenses incurred by the lender. Additionally, the normative effect of the registration would apply if the registrant transfers the indigenous reserve land registered in his/her name to a third party. |