月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
當代儒學研究 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
王廷相與戴震人性論比較
並列篇名
A Comparison between the Theories of Human Nature Proposed by Wang Tingxiang and Dai Zhen
作者 陳政揚
中文摘要
隨著明清氣學的研究日益熱絡,王廷相與戴震的氣學也相對受到學界所重視。在氣學的光譜上,王廷相與戴震屬於同一陣營。二者皆反對宋儒,尤其是朱子以形而上與形而下,二分理氣的觀點。不承認在存有論上,理有優先於氣的超越性。相對者,二者均將氣上抬為第一序的存有論概念。主張「理」是「氣之條理」。然而,在人性論上,二者卻有明顯的差異。王廷相主張性有善惡說,戴震則重新詮釋孟子性善論。在理欲關係上,王廷相採取嚴格的道德主義,認為成德之教起於澄思寡欲,甚至是無欲。但是,戴震卻主張達情遂欲,肯定滿足人之情欲,在實踐道德上,有其必要性。依此,本文從三方面展開討論:首先,指出二者對程朱以理言性說的共同批判。其次,辨析二者在性有善有惡論與性善論之分歧。最後,探討。何者更能在氣學的基礎上,安頓人性的道德面,由此承接儒門成德之教。
英文摘要
With the growing interest in the studies of Qi in the Ming and Qing Dynasties, the theories of Qi proposed by Wang Tingxiang and Dai Zhen’s have garnered academic attention. Both Wang and Dai were critical of Song Confucianism, particularly Zhu Xi’s dualism of metaphysical Li and physical Qi. They rejected the notion that Li transcends Qi ontologically. Instead, they considered Qi as the ontologically first-order concept and argued that Li serves as the pattern and order of Qi. However, Wang and Dai diverged in their understanding of human nature. Wang suggested that human nature encompasses both goodness and badness, while Dai reinterpreted Mencius’notion of innate goodness. Concerning the relationship between the Li and natural desires, Wang adopted a position of strict moralism, arguing that the cultivation of virtues begins with purifying one’s thoughts, suppressing desires, or even eliminating them. In contrast, Dai suggested that satisfying desires is necessary for the practice of morality. In this paper, the author aims to approach this topic by 1) highlighting the shared criticism of Wang and Dai towards Cheng Yi and Zhu Xi’s interpretation of the operation of Li in understanding human nature, 2) identifying the discrepancies between Wang’s argument on the duality of human nature and Dai’s perspective on the innate goodness of human nature, and 3) discussing whether Wang or Dai could contend adequately with the moral aspect of human nature on the basis of their studies of Qi and effectively continue the Confucian teaching of realizing virtues.
起訖頁 1-39
關鍵詞 天地之性義理之性氣質之性天人合一變化氣質heaven-and-earth-bestowed naturemoral naturematerial natureheaven and humanity in unitytransforming one’s disposition
刊名 當代儒學研究  
期數 202311 (34期)
出版單位 國立中央大學儒學研究中心
該期刊-下一篇 論牟宗三先生對於別教與圓教之詮釋──兼論王陽明的工夫論的別教與圓教意義
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄