英文摘要 |
This article is to discuss the CCP’s large-scale COVID-19 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, mainland China from 2019 to 2022, from being at a loss and not responding in a timely manner, to large-scale city closures, the establishment of square cabin hospitals, and from the police being “reprimanded” Dr. Li Wenliang, a whistleblower, has become ''sung''. The official admitted that the police's admonishment was improper, and the police were recorded and administratively punished. In addition, the Wuhan doctor Ai Fen who was censored since the early outbreak exposure caused anger on Chinese social media. Initiated the creation of different language versions to compete with censorship. From February 19, 2020, Wuhan strengthened its border control and comprehensive ''city closure'' measures. By March 14, 2020, Hubei Province's blockade was gradually relaxed, allowing people with ''green codes'' who have not been diagnosed Traveling in Hubei, until April 8th when Wuhan lifted the departure control and resumed external traffic. In late May, major night markets in Wuhan reopened. In addition, on March 27th, 2022, due to the large-scale infection of the new coronavirus Omicron variant, As a result, Shanghai, a model of epidemic prevention, had to abandon the ''precise prevention and control'' strategy and abide by the central government's ''dynamic clearing'' policy. Therefore, starting from March 28, with the Huangpu River as the boundary, the city was closed again in ''districts and batches''. Therefore, this paper will discuss the CCP regime under the governance of the ''authoritarian regime''. Facing the analysis of the ''dynamic zeroing'' strategy and the ''precise prevention and control'' strategy of epidemic prevention and control in the ''democratic regime'', what is the impact on the CCP regime? For this paper Motivation for research. |