英文摘要 |
It is claimed that Michael Oakeshott’s democratic thought has features similar to those of contemporary constitutional or deliberative democratic theories. Different from this claim, this article argues that Oakeshott’s democratic discourse is based on his critiques of the concept of democracy and the power issue of democratic governance, and due to these critiques, it is misleading to claim that Oakeshott anticipates a constitutional or deliberative democratic theory. Seen from this light, this article contests that Michael Minch’s deliberative democratic interpretation of Oakeshott’s thought is in fact a departure from Oakeshott’s philosophical considerations of democracy, which are related to the issues of“the idea of self-government”and“the democratic governance of the mass man politics”. Based on that, this article will also discuss the issue of contemporary populism and the problem of democratic faith from Oakeshott’s point of view. |