英文摘要 |
This article tries to make a second-order observation of ethnic-semantics based on Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Because“nation”defines itself as the homogeneous people of a state who have entered into a social contract, the variety of different peoples in a nation and the inequality among them cannot be described. Therefore, other categories are needed to analyze these two phenomena, and one among them is ethnicity. However,“ethnicity”is the result of“nation’s”re-entry in itself. In other words,“nation”observes itself with the distinction of system and environment. Observably,“nations”emerge in“nation,”and each of them is the so-called“ethnicity”. Moreover, since observers have noticed the paradox of the ethnic classifications, the so-called constructionism enables“ethnicity”to make self-reference based on ethnic reflexivity. Meanwhile, ethnic identity is an alternative to resolving the paradox of the classifications by incorporating individuality into the ethnic semantics. Ethnic identity then turns out to be the material for the construction of individuality. Finally, the argument of ethnic inequality reproduces itself with ethnic differences. However, as social inequalities are now contingent, statistics play the role of connecting the discourse of individual inequality and that of ethnic inequality. |