英文摘要 |
This study aims to compare the impact of legislation on carbon reduction basic laws in the cross-strait context on social self-discipline and the carbon trading market, using reflexive law theory as a benchmark. Firstly, the concept and principles of reflexive law theory are introduced, along with its application in legislation. The limitations of formalistic law are discussed, and a flexible approach is proposed, emphasizing the realization of legal objectives. In terms of social self-discipline, the establishment of a carbon trading market, information disclosure, and stakeholder orientation are examined. The carbon trading market incentivizes emission reduction actions through carbon pricing mechanisms, and transparent information disclosure and stakeholder participation are crucial for the successful operation of the carbon trading market. Finally, through analysis and evaluation of the legislation of carbon reduction basic laws in the cross-strait context, the similarities and differences between the two sides are compared. |