英文摘要 |
Rules of immediate application are the reflection of public mandatory rules in the level of conflict of laws. So when exploring the judging standards of rules of immediate application of China, it is necessary to draw a useful lesson from the influence of mandatory rules on validity of contracts. The interpretation of mandatory rules by switch-over clauses in resolving conflicts between public and private law have to play a special role. On the interpretation methods of mandatory rules by switch-over clauses, different from the rigid standard of legal hierarchy and standard of classification of norms which is answered by introducing another question, by entrusting judges with discretionary power, standard of balance of interest could use the proportionality test properly to well weigh the conflicts between public and private interest caused by rules of immediate application. On the scope of interpretation of mandatory rules by switch-over clauses, although the complete law doesn’t need the aid of switch-over clauses any more in theory, it should be carefully handled. Because the arrangement in advance of the PRC law is excessive and conflicts with the general interpretation of switch-over clauses. The incomplete law should be decided by the switch-over clauses of forum on how to have a private law impact on contracts. On the whole, Article 153 Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code of the PRC itself does not constitute a rule of immediate application. Instead, it is included in the system of rules of immediate application which defined in the Act of the PRC on Application of Law to Foreign-Related Civil Relations, so that this system could have comprehensive functions on choice of law in both conflicts among territorial laws and conflicts between public and private law. |