| 英文摘要 |
If one reads any Tibetan grammar , one is impressed in the very beginning by the definite rules which govern the prefixes, i. e. certain prefixes appear only before certain definite types of initials and do not appear before others. The native grammarians are equally sensitive of these and form rigid statements about them, which we may summarize al follows:
Such dictates of euphony as formulated by the native grammarians more or less according to their system of writing seems, at once, inadequate in the light of modern linguistics. As a matter of fact, the s in sl-and sr-is also undoubtedly a prefix although it is considered by the natives as having an initial s- witch a ra -btags and a la-btags. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
