法學繼受對法學研究及法學教育的連鎖影響──以德國法教義學在我國臺灣地區之繼受為例的反思

Chain Effect of Legal Succession on Legal Studies and Legal Education

當我們今天討論法學研究和法學教育應當主要朝向什麽方向發展以及具體如何進行調整時，與其是以德國或美國的情况作為參考樣版來徑直斷定我們應如何效仿行事，還不如先來仔細考察那些大規模進行某種法學繼受的地區的現狀（特別是其中存在的弊病），進而以一種後見之明對法學繼受過程當中應當注意避免的一些重要問題形成清醒認識。就此而言，以我國臺灣地區法學界長期以來大規模繼受德國法教義學為實例進行細緻檢視，並反思這一持續至今的法學繼受過程給當地法學界學術生態帶來的各種連鎖影響，可以為我們在當下謹慎思考中國大陸法學研究與法學教育的主要發展方向之選擇，以及自身法學的主體性意識之培養，提供某種必要的警醒。

When discussing the direction in which our legal research and legal education should be adjusted and how to adjust it, instead of using the situation of Germany or the United States as a reference template to directly determine how we should follow suit, we should better first examine the current situation of legal academia in those areas where large-scale legal reception has carried out (especially the chain disadvantages brought by this process) , and then form a clear understanding of some problems that should be avoided in the process of legal reception with a kind of hindsight. With regard to this, to examine the large-scale reception of German legal science in Taiwan region of China, and reflect on the various chain influences of this continuous legal reception process on the ecology of local legal academia, can provide us with a necessary reminder of the choice of the main development directions of legal research and legal education in Chinese mainland, as well as the cultivation of the subjective consciousness of the local legal science.