英文摘要 |
If the Chinese law does not adopt the ''abstractness'' mode for the change of real right during the performance of the sales contract, given that the change of real right can be analyzed from the perspective of discharge, the independent concept of “juridical act of real right” is unnecessary. Therefore, it is unnecessary to adopt the ''abstract juridical act of real right” mode. In the change of real right based on juridical acts, the moderate abstract concepts such as ''discharge'' and ''abandonment'' and so on are enough. With regard to the intention defects in the process of performance, from the perspective of discharge as a juridical act, the concept of discharge can solve the problems that the concept of juridical act of real right can and should solve, while the concept of juridical act of real right cannot solve the problems that the concept of discharge can and should solve. Therefore, the independent concept of juridical act of real right is not only insufficient, but also redundant. In addition, from the perspective of discharge , as to the so-called “juridical act of creditor's right plus form, mode for the change of real rights, the description is usually inaccurate, because it is not enough to explain the occurrence of real right change only according to the juridical act of creditor's right and form. The perspective of discharge that the discharge of the sales contract leads to the real right change is necessary. The discharge consists of the delivery or other factual behaviors, as well as the intention of discharge in the juridical act. The intention of ownership change is included in the intention of discharge. This mode may be called the ''discharge'' mode of real right change. |