地方創生法制設計的比較：農村發展基金會及立法委員草案

A Comparison of Legal Institutional Design on Local Revitalization: Bills of Rural Development Foundation and Taiwan’s Legislators

近年，日本社會及台灣社會同樣面臨少子女化、人口往大都市集中及城鄉發展不均衡等問題。對此，兩國官員、研究者及社會人士思考以地方創生政策與作為進行因應，希望前述問題有所緩和與改善。
農村發展基金會及幾位立法委員認為，除了行政院現有規畫，應該制定地方創生專法，以強化台灣政府的政策與作為。本文聚焦兩者的地方創生條例草案，對其法制設計進行比較，重點包括其關注背景、條文規定與條文說明。本文發現，兩者關注背景不同；條文規定與條文說明幾乎相同，因此法制設計也相同，初步判斷是立法委員參考該基金會草案後所撰寫並提出。

Due to the low-birth-rate, people into big cities and unbalanced between cities and rural problems are so serious in Taiwan and Japan societies. The official, researchers, and persons think that local revitalization may be the antidote for these problems, and hope that maybe these problems can be solved or improved.
Both the Rural Development Foundation and some of Taiwan’s legislators, think that the Executive Yuan’s planning was not enough, so they promoted it must need a special law on local revitalization. This paper is to make a comparison on the bills of the Rural Development Foundation and Taiwan’s legislators, and it focuses on its legal institutional design, including the background and articles. This paper finds that the background is different, but the articles were the same. Legislators maybe referred to the bill from the Rural Development Foundation.