英文摘要 |
In the past, employee bonus belonged to the item of after-tax profit distribution, and it has always been the most important and popular reward tool for attracting and retaining talented employee in Taiwan. Among them, the technology industry, semiconductor and other industries are the most prominent. However, after the employee bonus is in accordance with new international accounting standards, Article 235 and Article 235-1 of the Company Law were amended on May 20, 2005, the distribution of shareholder bonus and employee bonus pursuant to the articles of incorporation shall be listed as before-tax annual expenses to comply with the IFRS. Will this major change of bonus as before-tax expenses reduce international competitiveness or earnings per share due to increased costs ? How should companies respond to the impact of employee bonus as expenses while allocating limited resources more effectively to develop a reward system is critical for developing a harmonized mechanism. On one hand, it may retain employees to enhance corporate competitiveness, and on the other hand, it also may coordinate reasonable bonus ratio of employees, directors and shareholders, together with manager’s flexible performance bonus. From the perspective of corporate governance, this study employs the regulations of director and employee bonus of 20 listed companies in Taiwan, selects the best and worst company, and compares and analyzes their articles of incorporation to find out reasonable bonus ratio in practices. Compensation generally refers to remuneration and bonus. Fairness, independence, contribution and legal risks should be simultaneously taken into consideration for fair bonus distribution. In addition to paying managers and employees fixed salaries, performance bonuses, benefits, allowances, and traveling expenses, after-tax bonus can be co-shared to employees , directors and shareholders, how to balance the reasonable bonus ratio of employees, directors and shareholder is urged to induce employees, directors or even shareholders to participate corporate governance in the best interest of company., All interested party at stake may serve as collective wisdom to jointly supervise and manage the company, reconcile the company's best interests, strengthen the functions of the board of directors, while applying Internal control and auditing to prevent problems such as unfair rewards and punishments, unequal bonus distribution, etc., |