英文摘要 |
Theoretically speaking, the so-called ‘principle of non-recognition’ refers to the refusal of granting recognition to factual situations deriving from serious breaches of international legal obligations. There have been some cases surrounding this issue since the first half of the 20th century, and many writers, according to these cases, contend that this principle has become part of customary international law. This article, nevertheless, argues that the consistency of these state practices remains doubtful. Furthermore, despite there being many UN resolutions affirming the legal status of such a principle, whether these resolutions serve as adequate proof for consistent state practices is also questionable. Consequently, this article concludes that the non-recognition principle’s status as customary law still awaits future development and is, at present, far from certain. |