英文摘要 |
Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, the international development agendas have put more emphases on aid effectiveness. How to ensure the effectiveness from policies to development outcomes, the last stage of the aid process, is closely related to counterfactual analyses using micro-level data and causal inference techniques, recognized by Nobel Memorial Prizes in economics in 2015, 2019, and 2021. This paper reviews the background of aid effectiveness, introduces the logic and techniques of counterfactual analyses commonly used in development studies, and examines academic publications applying counterfactual analyses to evaluate Taiwan’s official development assistance (ODA) projects. These include three projects carried out by the International Cooperation and Development Fund (TaiwanICDF), namely horticulture projects in Kiribati and the Marshall Islands, two Small Island Developing States, and a food security project in Haiti. These evaluation studies go beyond the past practices of purely qualitative and descriptive evaluations of Taiwan’s ODA, which may suffer from being subjective. Counterfactual evaluations present and quantify TaiwanICDF’s aid effectiveness, increase the public’s understanding of Taiwan’s development aid and refute the negative stereotype of checkbook diplomacy. To conduct more rigorous impact evaluations, this paper suggests incorporating the evaluation design into the early stage of initial preparation to collect baseline data, increasing the number of observations and engaging in more interactions with other international development organizations. |