英文摘要 |
From the perspective of academic history, we examine Mr. Tai Lian-chang's reflections on Wang Bi's learning of Yijing and contextualize it through the research of Mr. Tang Yongtong and Prof. Mou Tsung-san. Significantly, we discern that Mr. Tai's treatise conforms with Prof. Mou's conclusion that “Metaphysics in Wei-Jin Dynasties should be retroactively linked to pre-Qin Daoism.” That is, Mr. Tai has systematically constructed a framework of understanding Wang Bi's learning of Yijing with his theory of “one principle”, namely, “to realize that 'non-existence' must be the cause of 'existence' and that all 'existence' must return to 'non-existence.'“ Additionally, by taking Wang Bi as a Taoist figure, Tai also constructed his philosophical system. The importance and contribution of Mr. Tai was that he constructed a relatively complete system of Wang Bi's learning of Yijing. However, this system is imperfect. In discussing the concept of “time (shi)”, we differentiate and revisit the concept of “time” in China and in the West. Mr. Tai's explanation of Wang Bi's learning of Yijing fails to carefully explicate the meaning of the word “time.” Although one can defend Mr. Tai's appraisal by rearranging key components of relevant discussions, the most fundamental and explicit approach is to drop the term “time” when investigating Wang Bi's learning of Yijing, and replace it with “opportunity” and “encounter” in the subsequent analyses and illustrations. It is assumed that people consider each respective opportunity and encounter to avoid misfortune. From this interpretation, we can both avoid confusion arising from the definition and use of nouns in China and in the West, but also stress that the Chinese tradition often conflates the characteristics of “time”, “space” and “personnel” in the context of the word “time.” |