月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
華岡法粹 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
COVID-19危機與歐盟衛生法
並列篇名
COVID-19 Crisis and EU Health Law
作者 陳靜慧 (Jing-Huei Chen)
中文摘要
歐盟有無衛生法,在1990年代中期仍有爭議。時至今日,多數看法已不再質疑歐盟衛生法是否存在,討論轉而聚焦於歐盟衛生法的範圍與內涵為何,本文目的即爲探討歐盟衛生法的範圍與法律框架。首先運用歷史研究法,依時序對歐盟衛生法此一法領域的形成過程進行研究,包括過去發展及今日所及範圍。其次介紹歐盟面對新冠疫情的危機處理方式,涵蓋透過公衛協調合作及危機處理機制、內部市場權限、財政治理框架而為之措施,並分析其對歐盟衛生法範圍的影響,同時闡述歐盟在經歷數波新冠疫情後就協助成員國強化公衛系統所提出之佈局與策略。接著針對歐盟衛生法發展迄今之內涵與結構可能隱含的問題作評析,包括間接立法衍生的隱憂,及強化歐盟專門機構問責制度之必要性。最後對本文研究議題作總結,並展望後疫情時代歐盟衛生法可能的發展趨勢。
英文摘要
In the mid-1990s, it was still controversial as to whether the notion of‘EU health law’existed or not. Very few people would nowadays dispute that‘EU health law’is a meaningful concept. Late studies turn the discussion to the scope of those entities. In this article, the author tries to identify the scope and framework of‘EU health law’. The article will review the historical emergence and development of the‘EU health law’as a distinctive body of law firstly. The following analyses how the EU’s health law and the tools have been utilized in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, mainly through encouraging cooperation between the member states in the sphere of public health based on the article 168 TFEU, civil protection mechanism, internal market competence and fiscal governance framework such as European Semester. It also describes the proposed changes to EU health policy for the coronavirus recovery phase. The following figures out the dark side of the‘EU health law’. One problem is that the indirect legislation, which means the EU has adopted many harmonizing measures in health law and policy based on the competence in other policy areas, principally internal market. Another issue is the accountability of European Agencies. European Agencies play an active and effective role in crisis management and public health governance in the EU. Many of them exercise a de facto decision-making power. This raises problems relating to legitimacy and accountability. This article demonstrates the structure of European Agencies and takes EMA as an example to clarify their problematic aspects. It then tries to present a more rational accountability framework for European Agencies in order to better balance accountability with independence and effectiveness. Finally, it outlines directions of future development of EU health law. It is commonly agreed that EU health law grows through crisis. Another transboundary public health crisis could prompt valuable steps.
起訖頁 45-93
關鍵詞 歐盟衛生法新冠肺炎跨域危機內部市場公民保護機制歐盟專門機構歐洲藥品管理局EU Health LawCOVID-19Transboundary CrisisInternal MarketCivil Protection MechanismEuropean AgencyEMA
刊名 華岡法粹  
期數 202206 (72期)
出版單位 中國文化大學法律學系
該期刊-上一篇 永續企業社會責任在歐盟市場之實踐與未來發展趨勢
該期刊-下一篇 跨境數位稅制的發展與挑戰
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄