英文摘要 |
Various international studies have shown that climate change is one of the biggest threats to mankind. However, to tackle climate change requires the cooperation of all countries in the world. Climate funds play an important role in promoting the cooperation between industrialized and developing countries with different positions. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted in 1992 and the Paris Agreement adopted in 2015 repeatedly reiterated that developed countries should provide funds and technologies to help developing countries strengthen their mitigation and adaptation capabilities. In the context of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities established in international climate negotiations and the development of climate justice, the international climate finance mechanisms are established accordingly. Among them, the bilateral climate finance mechanism is the most important source of climate funds. In this regard, taking the bilateral finance mechanism of the international climate mechanism as the research subject, this study aims to discuss whether the design of the bilateral climate finance mechanism of Germany conforms to climate justice from the perspective of climate justice. First, starting from the difficulties of climate governance, this study discusses the development of climate justice. Then, based on the concept of justice in philosophy, this study constructed an evaluation framework of climate justice in response to climate justice in International Environmental Law. Finally, taking the bilateral climate finance mechanism of Germany, an international climate initiative, as an example, this study examines whether this mechanism conforms to climate justice. According to the three dimensions of climate justice constructed in this study, we found that Germany's international climate initiative is mostly in line with the distribution and procedural justice. However, some evaluation indicators fail to reach the goal from the aspect of intergenerational justice. In this study, we believed that donor countries' design of climate finance mechanism will be more in line with the needs of recipient countries if the design conforms to the climate justice evaluation framework. |