個人資訊保護的反壟斷法視角

市場雙重結構失衡，使得對隱私的個人保護（私法）、國家保護（公法）存在著明顯不足，亟需作為市場修復機制的反壟斷法支援。反壟斷法關注隱私侵害并不是對其內在機理的顛覆。從一開始，它就被定位為對競爭的保護，而非與某項特定的消費者福利掛鉤。芝加哥學派“唯價格論”使得非價格損害被遺漏，限縮了反壟斷法的視野。新布蘭代斯學派主張的以結構關切為核心的競爭保護觀，則為反壟斷法適應隱私保護的需求鋪平了道路。反壟斷法融入個人資訊保護法律體系，在填補了個人保護、國家保護的缺口之外，還啟動了自我控制規則和豐富了國家保護層次。這種融入絕非簡單的制度拼接，而是需要對不同保護機制之間潛在的衝突進行調和，最終形成多種保護機制的攜手并進。

The dual structural imbalance of the market results in obvious deficiencies in personal protection(private law)and state protection(public law)for privacy,and the support from anti-monopoly law as a market repair mechanism is urgently needed.Anti-monopoly law’s concern about privacy infringement does not constitute a subversion of its inherent mechanism.From the outset,it has been positioned as a protection against competition rather than a link to a particular consumer welfare.The Chicago School of“price-only theory”omits non-price damage and limits the scope of application of antitrust law.New-Brandeis School’s view of competition protection with structural concerns as the core paves the way for antitrust law to meet the needs of privacy protection.The integration of the anti-monopoly law into the legal system of personal information protection not only fills the gap between private protection and state protection,but also activates self-control rules and enriches the level of national protection.This integration is by no means a simple institutional mishmash,but requires the reconciliation of potential conflicts between different protection mechanisms,and finally enables multiple protection mechanisms to go hand in hand.