英文摘要 |
This paper investigates Nakai Riken's appraisal of Zhu Xi's Daxue zhangju (Interpretation of the Great Learning) by reference to the former's Daigaku zaggi (Commentary on the Great Learning). Nakai Riken was a Japanese scholar from the Kaitokudō Academy in the Edo period. Although Nakai's Daigaku zaggi was based on Zhu's Daxue zhangju, their interpretations of the Great Learning diverged sharply. According to the analysis of this paper, the root cause of their differences was twofold. First, the two scholars differed widely in their assessments of the Great Learning's form and function. Second, they understood several key concepts found in the Great Learning differently. This paper concludes by organizing and analyzing these results to reposition Nakai's Daigaku zaggi in intellectual history. |