《攝大乘論抄》研究

A Study of the Subcommentary on the Mahāyānasamgraha (T2806)

中國唯識學一般以唐代玄奘(602-664) 的唯識學為分界點，以玄奘所傳護法(530-561) 一系為新學，以玄奘之前真諦(499-569) 譯本所傳為古學。六朝至初唐前期唯識學以闡釋大乘要義的無著（活動於4 世紀）《攝大乘論》(Mahāyānasaṃgraha)、詮解菩薩十地修行的世親（活動於4-5 世紀）《十地經論》這兩部論書為中心，在中國南北方曾分別蔚為風潮，形成後來的地論學派及攝論學派。

The subcommentary of the Mahāyānasamgraha is a rare Tang dynasty commentary found in Dunhuang. A transcription is included in the Taishō shinshū daizōkyō, No. 2806. By analyzing its authorship, date, form and philosophical views, this study reaches four conclusions. First, the views expressed in the subcommentary of the Mahāyānasamgraha are similar to those of the southern division of the Dilun school. Second, the style and thought of the subcommentary of the Mahāyānasamgraha are similar to those of Zhiyan; therefore, the author of the subcommentary of the Mahāyānasamgraha might have been a successor to Zhiyan. Third, since Paramārtha's translation of the Mahāyānasamgraha is used as a source text, the subcommentary of the Mahāyānasamgraha can be dated to between the end of the seventh century and the start of the eighth century. It uses the same technical terms as Xuanzang and his disciples; it was therefore most likely written after Xuanzang's translation of the Mahāyānasamgraha, and is contemporaneous with the works of Kuiji and Dunlun. Fourth, many differences exist between T2806 and S.2554: they differ in terms of formula, calligraphy, teaching taxonomy and philosophy. From these differences, we can conclude that they are not the same text.