月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
運輸計劃季刊 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
酒駕重罰下,「喝酒不開車,開車不喝酒」?酒駕政策效果的評估
並列篇名
“DON’T DRINK AND DRIVE”?–ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF DRUNK DRIVING POLICES
作者 詹昀姍尤素娟蔡偉德
中文摘要
政府過去數次修法加重酒駕刑事罰和行政罰,希望全面扼止酒駕事件的發生。本文結合民國97-109 年6 月內政部警政署交通事故調查報告表資料,評估多次酒駕政策修法的成效。研究結果發現:若以民國97 年至10年12 月的酒駕狀況為對照組,後續三次修法加重酒駕的處罰,使駕駛人酒駕機率累計下降70%,同時高酒精濃度駕駛人的佔比也明顯降低。此外,我們的估計結果顯示:民國101-109 年間酒駕罰則的修法,使酒駕肇事的死亡人數累計減少2,498 人,但受傷人數卻無明顯變化,可能的原因是中低酒測值之酒駕者人數的提高,造成受傷人數的增加,抵消了因高酒測值者下降所減少受傷的人數。歷次嚴懲酒駕的修法的確對降低酒駕行為有明顯的成效,但未能完全促使駕駛人分離“飲酒'與“開車'的行為,達到「喝酒不開車,開車不喝酒」的政策目的。
英文摘要
This paper empirically analyzes the effects of drunk driving policies. Since 2008, the government has revised criminal law 185-3 and article 35 of Road Traffic Management and Punishment Regulations, aiming to eliminate drunk driving events by increasing criminal and administrative punishments for drunk driving. Based on the 2008-2020 Investigation Report of Traffic Accident from the National Police Agency, Ministry of the Interior, we assessed the ffectiveness of the multiple amendments to the drunk driving policies in reducing drunk drivers and alcohol-related casualties. Taking the drunk driving ratio from 2008 to early December 2011 as the control group, we found that the three subsequent amendments of drunk driving policies until June 2020 did cumulatively reduce the probability of drunk driving by 70%. The distribution curve of the BrAC value of drunk drivers who took the alcohol test also shifted to the left; in other words, drunk drivers drink less in response to severe punishments. The three subsequent amendments to the drunk driving policies also reduced the alcohol-related mortality by 2,498 deaths but did not significantly reduce the overall number of injured. A plausible reason might be that the increase of low/middle BrAC drivers may cause a rise in injuries, but it offsets the reduced injuries associated with fewer high BrAC drivers. The new policies did not wholly persuade the drivers to separate the “drinking” and “driving” and achieve the goal of “do not drink and drive.” Our results offer policy implications for further deterrence of drunk driving.
起訖頁 117-142
關鍵詞 酒駕刑法第185-3條道路交通管理處罰條例第35條酒駕行政懲罰酒駕刑事懲罰Drunk drivingDUIArticle 185-3 of Criminal LawArticle 35 of Road Traffic Management and Punishment Regulationsadministrative punishment for drunk drivingcriminal punishment for drunk driving
刊名 運輸計劃季刊  
期數 202206 (51:2期)
出版單位 交通部運輸研究所
該期刊-上一篇 基於事件隨機性考量之國道緊急應變派遣模式
該期刊-下一篇 號誌化路口行人安全績效模式之研究
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄