|
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。 【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】
|
篇名 |
八大多元智慧問卷的信、效度分析
|
並列篇名 |
Analysis of Reliability and Validity of 8 Multiple Intelligences Questionnaire |
作者 |
周子敬 |
中文摘要 |
本研究目的在於檢測Gardner所倡導八大多元智慧並確認是否適用於台灣。根據Prez, Beltramino, & Cupani(2003)等人所建立八大多元智慧量表,針對國內16-20歲(與Prez 等人所調查年齡相同)樣本進行便利抽樣,以檢測相關智慧構念存在性及適用性。主要發現,分述如次:(1)八大智慧Cronbach’s α都超過0.9以上(n=1449)及各智慧之間的相關係數均達0.001顯著水準,表示此量表有很高的一致性和可靠性;(2)經EFA,通過文獻建議五項議題檢驗,萃取出八大智慧因素共有69個項目,特徵值總解釋變異達68.97%;(3)經CFA檢驗八大智慧因素構念效度從69個項目縮減為52個項目。根據以上信、效度分析結果,本研究歸納出來的八大多元智慧問卷可以適用於國內環境。 |
英文摘要 |
The aim of this study was to examine Gradner’s 8 multiple intelligences and to identify its applicability in Taiwan. The questionnaire, based on the collective work of Pérez, Beltramino & Cupani (2003), sampled subjects from the age group of 16-20 in Taiwan (same age population as Pérez et al., 2003) and tested the existence and applicability of relevant intelligence constructs. The important findings were as follows: (a) The Cronbach’s α for all intellengences exceeded .9 (n=1449), and the correlation coefficients between every two intelligences were all significant (P< .0001), indicating that this questionnaire has high consistency and reliability; (b) There were 8 factors extracted and 69 items retained after the tests of 5 criteria and EFA; (c) For examination of construct validity, the number of items had been reduced to 52 through CFA. The aforementioned finding demonstrates that the 8 multiple intelligences questionnaire is applicable in Taiwan. |
起訖頁 |
215-229 |
關鍵詞 |
多元智慧、構念效度、探索性因素分析、驗證性因素分析、EFA、CFA、Multiple intelligence、Construct validity、Exploratory factor analysis、Confirmatory factor analysis |
刊名 |
教育心理學報 |
期數 |
200603 (37:3期) |
出版單位 |
國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系
|
該期刊-下一篇 |
課室目標線索與個人目標導向對國小學童解題成就及自我調整學習之交互效果 |
|