英文摘要 |
"This study analyzes the importance and satisfaction of services provided by liner shipping companies, and investigates the degree of need for additional services. The questionnaire survey is made to clients of liner shipping companies, including shipping forwarders, importers and exporters. As for data analysis, Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) is used to analyze the major service quality gap and improvement strategy for each service item. The analysis of variance is used to verify that clients in terms of different countries, shipment volume and container types, and to evaluate significant differences in the overall satisfaction. Additionally, we also analyze the degree of need for additional services. The results show that the major five service quality gaps are efficiency of noticing arrival, slot availability, efficiency of noticing schedule update, empty container availability and efficiency of revising bills of lading. Additionally, the cluster analysis is used to derive five similar service group: (1) COSCO, OOCL, Evergreen, CMA and Yang Ming, they have the service advantages in terms of booking, notice of arrival, containers, quotation, pricing, documents and customer services, (2) Hapag-Lloyd, MSC and SITC, they have the service advantages in terms of documents, (3) Maersk, ONE, Hyundai and KMTC, they have the service advantages in terms of quotation and pricing, (4) Wan Hai has the service advantages in terms of containers, quotation, pricing, documents and customer services, (5) Generally, T.S LINES, has no significant service advantages in terms of the five services." |