英文摘要 |
"While it is emphasized by multiple international organizations, such as UNESCO, OECD, and EU, lifelong learning for public employees has earned little attention in Taiwan because it is poorly defined in the Civil Service Training and Continuing Education Act. However, the importance of lifelong learning is being raised due to the continuous and rapid changes caused by globalization and informatization. A single specialty and a lifetime-job have become impossible; interdisciplinary and self-directed learning are necessary. To cultivate employees to be able to survive and serve as leaders for the changing age, a drastic transformation of the lifelong learning system in the public sector in Taiwan is a must.
This study aims to understand the status quo and the problems of the lifelong learning system for public employees in Taiwan by analyzing the traits of participants in the lifelong learning activities and comparing them with those of the participants in the training activities. In order to do this, this study poses two research questions: (1) What are the traits of participants in the lifelong learning and training activities, respectively? Are there any differences? (2) What do the differences mean from the viewpoint of public human resources management in terms of elevating the quality of public human resources?
This study analyzes data from the government human resource database in Taiwan from 2002-2012 and survey data from “Research on the Promotion System in the Public Sector in Taiwan,” conducted by Dr. Don-Yun Chen from National Chengchi University in 2012. The results show that training-session participants had higher self-reported performance, and clear career goals; lifelong learning participants viewed themselves as performing well at work but feeling unsatisfied because they do not make use of their expertise on the job. They also were characterized by a higher work transfer rate. The results suggest the importance of a clear function of lifelong learning, which should be individual-oriented, contrary to training, which is organization-oriented. " |