論著作權法的範式轉換從“權利”到“行為規制”

現行著作權法條文的構造具有濃厚的自然權理論色彩，重視對著作人身權的保護，且在處理著作財產權時拘泥於物權構造。靜態思維的權利範式缺乏體系化思維，將著作權誤解為對作品這一無體“物”享有的權利。然而，著作權的本質是行為規制，其對私人行動自由的限制程度較高。因此，著作權法的思維方式也需要從靜態思維的權利範式轉向動態思維的行為規制範式。動態思維的行為規制範式，既可以糾正政策形成過程中的利益傾斜問題，也可以彌補著作權法條文與使用者普遍認知之間的偏差。

"The structure of the prevailing copyright law is firmly based on the classical theory of natural rights, attaching importance to personality rights, and adhering to the system of real rights when dealing with property rights. The rights paradigm of static conception lacks systematic consideration, and it misunderstands copyright as the right to the incorporeal“thing”. However, the essence of copyright is behavior regulation, and it restricts the freedom of private actions. Therefore, the conception of copyright law needs to change from the static paradigm of rights to the dynamic paradigm of behavior regulation. The behavioral regulation paradigm with dynamic conception can redress the interest-centric problem in the process of policy formation and make up the discrepancy between provisions of the copyright law and users’general awareness."