論基本權利衝突

On the Collision of Fundamental Rights

由於人類生活的社會性、資源的稀缺性、個人價值觀的差異性及法律規範本身的概括性和不周延性等原因，基本權利沖突在所難免。在自由權侵害三階層審查框架中，基本權利沖突具有多重地位，兼具規範性和事實性，難以在某一階層或者採用單一方案徹底解決此類問題，何況各種解決方案本身也存在不足，故而不僅應關注經由解釋明確基本權利保護範圍、依照基本權利位階予以處理、根據實踐調和原則進行個案權衡、引入比例原則、基本權利行使的前置程序等解釋論方案，還應關注通過立法預先設定解決方案的立法論方案。

"Due to the sociality of human livings, the scarcity of resources, the diversity of values, the generality and imperfectness of the legal norms and so on, it is inevitable to have collisions among the individual fundamental rights. Such collision not only plays various and important roles in the three-tiers framework of infringement of liberties and freedoms scrutiny, but also is a combination of norms and facts; therefore, it could not be expected to resolve such collisions within a single-tier approach. Besides, the approaches themselves are imperfect. As a result, in order to resolve the collision, it is necessary to resort to the approaches of interpretation, such as the definition of the scope and hierarchy of fundamental rights, the application of the principle of practical concordance, the individualized consideration, the incorporation of proportionality, the pre-procedure of exercise the fundamental rights, and it is also necessary to pay attention to the legislation prescribing the resolution of such collision."