| 英文摘要 |
"Interventions concerning the management of the Yellow River had started to diminish as a result of the reduction in state capacity during the late Qing and early Republican period, and in the late 1920s and early 1930s, during another round of regime transition, the role of the state in Yellow River conservancy receded even further. Consequently, local society had to fend for itself and began to undertake a vast number of responsibilities. Local elites, for example, formed river conservancy associations, mobilized all social sectors in attempts to salvage the situation, and worked towards securing government funding. Within the processes of local competition for resources, geopolitical and even academic ties assumed enormous importance, and the fact that river conservancy was often a significant pan-regional and military project means it also became a bargaining chip for localities. The case studies in this paper also suggest that, in the matter of Yellow River management, the recession of state capacity had varying effects on different areas along the river and coastal regions. Compared to the logistically important areas along the river, the internal socio-economic power of the coastal regions was relatively weak and more reliant on the state pertaining to Yellow River conservancy. However, such regions lacked any geopolitical advantages and thus failed to secure the attention of the state, resulting in long delays in the resolution of flooding." |