英文摘要 |
In order to raise the performance of commercialization of federal funded research, the U.S. passed the Bayh-Dole Act in 1980. The Bayh-Dole establishes a comprehensive legal framework to enforce, manage and commercialize the patent right of funded scientific research results. Although the Bayh-Dole Act empowers the contractors of the government funding projects to retain the patent rights of research result, the contractor is not automatic entitled to patent right under the framework of the US legal system. In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court of Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. ruled that the original ownership of patent right is entitled to inventor. Thus, the inventor shall assign the right to the institutions then the institutions can retain the rights under the funded projects. In 2018, the United States made amendments to certain Bayh-Dole implementing rules which require the contractor take measures to ensure that their employees’ invention rights are assigned to the contractors. Germany is one of leading country in technology transfer in the world. Because of the success of Bayh-Dole model, Germany abolished the professor’s privilege and adopted the Bayh-Dole style to manage and utilize academic patent since 2002. Moreover, the Germany Employed Inventor’s Act provides 30% shares to employed inventors for researchers in the universities or research institutions. This article will exam the law, cases and school regulations with respect to the ownership of patent, and the compensation for inventors both in US and Germany. Further, the article would discuss difference between these two countries to provide suggestions to formulate an incentive oriented system for our research institutions or universities. |