英文摘要 |
Galapai was a Han settlement located in “Fandi, or savage land (蕃地),” during the period of Japanese occupation. Due to difficulties of distinguishing and analyzing the people or ways of life in such a settlement, they seldom receive the critical attention of scholars. By using neglected archival materials, conducting fieldwork and having in-depth interviews, the present study examines a case which reflects the changes of state governance and development plans in the mountain area. By studying the exceptionality of such a “savage land” settlement, the present study aims to shed light on ways of making a living while living in an unregistered zone, which illustrates the importance of daily life practices in the formation of community identity. Galapai was located in Fandi land in present-day Jiale Village, Jianshi Township, Hsinchu County. This article first examines the Fandi framework that was designed by the Japanese colonial government in the 1920s to develop Taiwan's rinya or the forest and arable land. The establishment of Galapai was related to a project proposed by the Japanese capitalist, Hayakawa Tetsuya who, in 1921, applied for a piece of land inside the “savage” area to conduct agriculture and forestry. In the following years, Hayakawa's team recruited dozens of Han people, provided them with equipment, and relied on their labors to overcome the difficulties of introducing the capitalist mode of production into Taiwan's savage land. This article then examines the daily life of the Galapai residents with a focus on how they turned Galapai into a thriving place and community through their exchanges of livelihood and labor. After World War II, however, because the residents were unable to secure their right to the land under the new government, the Galapai settlement dissolved. In keeping with the rising interest of scholars in writing history from below, border studies, and people's history, this article proposes what may be called “history from within.” That said, without denying the all-embracing and totalizing power of the modern state and capitalism, such “history from within” studies seek to examines the gap that existed within and between the political and economic regimes manufactured by the state and the capitalist class, in hopes of hearing to the voices of what anthropologist Eric Wolf famously calls the “people without history.” |