政府採購法上申訴決定撤銷範圍之研究

A Study on the Scope of Withdrawing of the Decision of Complaint for the Government Procurement Act

目前實務上應循異議申訴程序救濟之政府採購爭議，主要類型包括招標、審標、決標之爭議，通知列不良廠商並刊登採購公報之爭議，以及部分有關押標金沒入或追繳之爭議。然而不同之採購申訴審議委員會，在申訴有理由時，其審議決定所撤銷之範圍並非一致；而行政院公共工程委員會採購申訴審議委員會所撤銷者僅異議決定。本文藉由探討政府採購雙階法律關係之法理，司法實務之判決，以及權利救濟之充分性，就前述爭議類型之申訴決定撤銷範圍分別加以分析。本文認為，僅撤銷異議決定未撤銷原處分之作法，係因誤解政府採購前、後階段法律效果之關係，同時基於救濟充分性之考量，採購申訴審議有理由時，其撤銷範圍應包括原處分。

In practice, the main types of disputes of government procurement currently include disputes about tendering invitation, tender evaluation, and contract awarding; disputes about notifying the vendor to be published on the Government Procurement Gazette for misbehavior(s); and part of the disputes related to confiscation or recovery of the bid bond deposited. However, with different Complaint Review Board for Government Procurement (“CRBGP”), the scope of withdraw differs; and the CRBGP of the Public Construction Committee of Executive Yuan withdraws only the decision for the protest without the original administrative disposition. The article investigates the legal principles of the two-stage legal relationship of government procurement, the judgments of judicial practice, and the adequacy of rights relief, and analyzes the scope of withdrawing of the appeal decisions of the aforementioned dispute types respectively. The article claims that the reason of withdrawing only the decision for the protest without the original administrative disposition is due to the misunderstanding of the relationship between the legal effects of the pre- and post-stages of government procurement. At the same time, based on the consideration of the adequacy of remedies, the scope of withdrawing should include the original administrative disposition when the complaint is justifiable.