英文摘要 |
Japan's constitutional system was revised under the guidance of the country's traditional inheritance legislation with the occupation of the Allied Powers. Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution clearly stipulates that the country renounces copyright war laws, and has long abided by disputes between Japan's political and academic circles. May constitute an obstacle to Japan's ''normal country'' and the maintenance of national security, especially in the face of the recent rise of the People's Republic of China and the strengthening of US-Japan security and the Korean Peninsula issue, it is further passive and limited, but from the other hand On the other hand, those advocating for the protection of the constitution pointed out that the country's past World War II caused human civilization and the defeat of the country to be introspected. The peaceful constitutional clause just overcomes what was caused in the past, but it was simply abandoned. In 2017, Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe dismissed the parliament in recent years, and the monuments were re-elected. In the course of political development, the process of political games is more widely revolved around, and the constitutional academic community has also heatedly debated the value of post-war constitutional government in Japan. In the absence of integration of opposition parties, facing a liberal democracy with a strong work style, the election of the parliament suffered a major defeat, and the Abe cabinet was able to control the majority of the parliament and the executive branch, crossing the constitutional biology in one fell swoop. |