英文摘要 |
Fear appeal is a widely used strategy for persuading target audiences in governmental and non-profit organizations. Therefore, how to effectively design fear appeal messages to change the attitudes, intentions, and behaviors of the target audience has long been an important issue to explore. This thesis attempts to investigate the effectiveness of smoking cessation programs from the perspective of the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM). According to the EPPM, the perceptions of threat and efficacy of individuals toward a threatening event will jointly determine the success or failure of fear appeals. For this reason, this research examines how and why target audiences respond differently to fear appeal messages in smoking cessation programs. The major research findings are summarized below: First, individuals who are highly susceptible to the harm of smoking tend to have greater levels of perceived threat. Second, individuals using non-nicotine smoking cessation drugshave greater levels of perceived efficacy than people using nicotine replacement therapy or willpower to quit smoking. Third, for threat messages, older people are more concerned about their health whereas the youths are more: concerned about other people's reactions and the price of cigarettes. Last, individual differences do not have significant effects on perceived efficacy. The findings of this research indicate that individuals motivated to quit smoking by threat messages often fail as a result of lack of efficacy messages. Therefore, designing smoking cessation campaigns should put more emphasis on providing efficacy messages about available non-nicotine smoking cessation drugs to increase the perceived efficacy of the target audience. |