英文摘要 |
In an age when knowledge is easily acquired, there is no lack of creativity; the important issue is how to choose good creativity. And it also has important reference value for the interaction principle and improvement between creative workers and managers. Using products of the Bauhaus era to assess understanding of creativity will facilitate the generation and selection of creative concepts. This study used Mueller's eight creativity indicators to evaluate which type of attitude Taiwanese people hold regarding creativity. The study also compared how results differ in terms of products deemed to be creative – with Bauhaus and modern chairs as the stimulus. The conclusions are as follows: (1) Types of Taiwanese attitudes toward creativity: A relatively high level of need for rational practical factors and a relatively low level of need for the emotional novelty factors. The Taiwanese attitude toward creativity is a pragmatic ''how/best'' type. (2) Comparison of attitude types toward creativity and creative types of chairs: From practical indicators such as convenient to use, easy to manufacture, and mass market, however, through specific stimulus of Bauhaus and modern chairs, the creative indicators transform into fashion, special methods, operational fields, turning toward ''why/potential.'' For Taiwanese people, whose primary mode of economic development is the manufacturing industry, this change in attitude toward creativity is understandable. (3) Differences in creative indicators for Bauhaus and modern chairs: The mean values of all five classic Bauhaus chairs were higher than those of the modern chairs; through stimulus of the chairs, ''fashion'' became the creativity indicator with the highest mean values. The production technology of products affects the outcome of creative concepts as well as the outcomes of creativity types. |