月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
國文學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
明代四書學撰作形態的發展與轉折
並列篇名
The Development and Transition of the Writing about the Four Books in Ming Dynasty
作者 陳逢源
中文摘要
朱熹以四書建構儒學體系,明代則是四書具體實踐時代,不同階層,不同立場,不同角度,從政教而及士人,由士人而及庶民,從實踐到反思,從反思到創發,共同進行四書義理的思考,以明代四書著作數量統計,以及善本蒐輯的觀察,趨勢所在,可以分出三個發展階段:初太祖、惠帝、成祖、仁宗、宣宗、英宗、景帝,援朱學為政化基礎,為治統政教時期;憲宗、孝宗、武宗、世宗、穆宗凸顯個人經典詮釋的見解,為義理辨析時期;神宗、光宗、熹宗、思宗心學、理學彼此激辯,為多元開展時期。儒學浸潤影響,不同階段有不同訴求,朱學於帝制、士紳、庶民之間擴散發展,帝王援以纘承道統,肆行政教合一的訴求;士人援以為立身處世之思考;浸而及於士庶之間,書坊援以取利祿,學者用以取功名,各逞意見,各立宗旨,心學、理學的分化,更觸發多元競起的詮釋,四書為明儒學術核心,濡染影響由此可見。
英文摘要
Zhu Xi constructed the system of Confucianism basing on the Four Books. As for Ming dynasty, people of different levels practiced the philosophy in the Four Books from different stands. Rulers, officials, and common people all practiced and rethought the ordinance of the Four Books. After pondering, they even put forward new theories. According to the quantity and content of their writings about Four Books, there are three phases of the development in Ming. First, the period of imperial education: rulers quoted Zhu's curriculum as the basis of education in Ming Taizu, Huidi, Chengzu, Renzong, Xuanzong, Yingzong, and Jingdi. Second, the period of analyzing the ordinance: scholars emphasized personal interpretations of the classics in Ming Xianzong, Xiaozong, Wuzong, Shizong, and Muzong. Third, the period of diverse advancement: people argued about Philosophy of Mind (xinxue) and Philosophy of Principle (lixue) with each other in Ming Shenzong, Guangzong, Xizong, and Sizong. It reveals that Confucianism gave different people different influences and Zhu's curriculum were spread and developed by rulers, officials, as well as common people. The emperors quoted the Four Books to succeeded to “Succession to the Way (daotong)” in order to fuse academia with politics. The officials quoted it to think of the best way of living in the world. The bookshops used it to acquire wealth while scholars used it to achieve honor by expressing their opinions. Moreover, the division between Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Principle agitated people to give more interpretation of the Four Books. To be sure, the Four Books was the academic core of Confucianism in Ming and had great influence on people.
起訖頁 67-102
關鍵詞 明儒朱學四書心學理學Ming ScholarsZhu Xi's Curriculumthe Four BooksPhilosophy of Mind Philosophy of Principle
刊名 國文學報  
期數 202012 (68期)
出版單位 國立臺灣師範大學國文學系
該期刊-上一篇 經學與文學詮釋中的「感鬼神」:歐陽修的觀點
該期刊-下一篇 晚明心性分合──以李見羅、胡廬山、許敬庵之論辯為例
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄